write a paper

or this response, please consider the following quote from Natalie Diaz’s NY Times review of Whereas: Poems by Layli Long Solider (the full review is linked below and is well worth reading, if you have not read it already): The American poet Layli Long Soldier’s debut collection, “Whereas,” is in part a response to the Congressional resolution of apology to Native Americans, which President Obama signed in obscurity in 2009. There were no Native Americans present to receive the apology, as most never knew an apology was made. In an introduction to the title poem, Long Soldier writes: “My response is directed to the apology’s delivery, as well as the language, crafting and arrangement of the written document.” She is referring at least to the disclaimer that renders the document’s admissions of crimes null in legal matters. It can be argued she is referring to a more general language exercised in American documents, including American poetry. “Whereas” is an excavation, reorganization and documentation of a structure of language that has talked the United States through its many acts of violence. This book troubles our consideration of the language we use to carry our personal and national narratives. Using at least (2) specific examples from poems in the book, discuss how you think Long Soldier in Whereas attempts to “trouble(s) our consideration of the language we use to carry our personal and national narratives”, and whether or not you think she succeeds at this and why. * Here are some links to introduce Layli Long Soldier and to help you read the text... ~ Layli Long Soldier Academy of American Poets bio page: [login to view URL] Poetry Foundation bio page: [login to view URL] A Long Soldier reading: [login to view URL] More poems by Long Soldier: [login to view URL] A longer poem by Long Soldier: [login to view URL] A short interview: [login to view URL] Whereas: Poems Review at NY Times: [login to view URL] Review at LA Times: [login to view URL] Long Soldier at PBS: [login to view URL]